Reply #55: Sorry....

[SDuderstadt]

one book does not prove your claim. Above and beyond that, it defies logic that anyone who had the ability to pull off the conspiracy would do something as easily detectable as painting on the actual frames. More importantly, if you were going to pull off the conspiracy, why would you do it in such a way that would require you to, somehow, identify everyone who shot film that day, somehow get control of their film, somehow alter it then get it back to wherever it was without anyone noticing? Even more importantly, the medical evidence is entirely consistent with the Zapruder film.

I don't care how many "Hollywood experts" you get. It's also notable that these "eight Hollywood experts" are conveneintly not named. You really need to take some critical thinking classes and study the concept of "convergence of evidence" before you just buy whatever CT's are peddling.

Ny the way, you also put several paragraphs in quotation marks, but never provide the link to where you got that material. What are you hiding? The source?