Reply #65: Have I mis-characterized your interpretation of the events?

[Flatulo]

If I have, sorry... please clarify.

It seems to me that you are so completely fixated on the (apparent) impossibility of an airplane penetrating a steel and glass building that there is absolutely no scenario sufficiently bizarre or unlikely that you will not latch onto it in order to support your belief.

Airplane debris on the streets and surrounding rooftops? No problem - it was all planted.

Eyewitnesses? No problem - they're all just hysterical or confused.

DNA evidence? No problem - all planted.

Missing passengers and planes? No problem - the perps have disappeared them.

Dozens of videos and photos showing the crash of 175? No problem - they've all been faked.

Columns that blow inward? No problem - magic explosives planted on the outside of the most visible landmark for a thousand miles.

People in the lobby doused/burned with jet fuel? No problem - storage tanks magically planted.

I could go on for hours. Spooked, you are truly a unique individual. About the only thing missing from your narrative is black holes and space aliens... but I'm a patient man.