Reply #34: Yep they were there, but why?

[RayUbinger]

piobair writes:

> that particular station responded to the wtc as many as 4 or 5 times per shift.

Yes I already quoted that claim, if you read my last post. Now please explain WHY they might be called there so often. WTC catching on fire five times a day?? Remember that Tony is portrayed has not having a fire until 9/11. When he's shown at WTC in that pre-S11 scene, he's just standing around in a uniform, smiling and getting his picture taken. It's a tough job, but some fake firefighter's gotta do it!


> your noble "I am addressing all our citizens" is just so much crap. You are addressing a very small subset by posting here.

I'll talk to anybody, was my point. (Reread what you misquoted.) This is the forum I have time to do so in. For all I know, you are a S11 victim family member. I would tell them same as I tell you: the Naudet movie was intended to be about S11 all along, ever since they started filming in June 2001. There were three FDNY-associated cameras filming at the instant of the 1st Hit, and two of them were pointed at the WTC while the third was just 3 blocks from WTC.


> you have absolutley no credibility

That's why I directly show the video evidence so people can see what I'm talking about for themselves. For instance the sneaky splicing of Tony into the blurry pan-left to make him look like he was really present in the crowd at the Gorumba funeral on Sept 1:
http://911foreknowledge.com/funeral
and the cattleprod or syringe looking thing, with a narrow smooth unsegmented sharply pointed metallic rod, that they wielded at the time and place of "finding" Father Judge's body on Sept 11:
http://tinyurl.com/7kuqx



Ray Ubinger
http://911foreknowledge.com