Reply #8: Obviously, you agree one way or another "inside job" . . .

[defendandprotect]

however, I think the Pentagon is the perfect example of where to begin looking for a plane

and difficult to find one!

We have a reporter who was covering the area of the Pentagon for CNN telling us quite clearly

and confidently -- no plane.

We have a taxi driver indicating the alleged incident on the highway/fallen telephone poles ...

was a set up he didn't want to be involved with.

We have witnesses who identify a different route for the "plane" and it ends up looking like a

flyover.

We have woman -- believe the woman who is suing now -- who was sitting behind the area where

the "plane" supposedly hit/entered! She's specifically suing because Pentgagon issued no

warning of "incoming." We have Minetta's testimony that "incoming" was being reported to

Cheney at various intervals -- from 50 miles out.

We have a 20X15 foot hole -- presumably made by a "bunker buster" -- which the plane which

was 44 feet high and much, much wider could not have made it thru without leaving most of itself

OUTSIDE on the ground.

We have the Pentagon offering a film of NO PLANE --

and now supplying Citgo and hotel film of NO PLANE --

And, those who should know say that the Pentagon had an anti-missile system --

and we presume that was turned off. Just a slow day in DC with four boring simulated

programs being run. Why bother putting on your anti-missile system?*

Once the Pentagon plane is gone -- and it's disappearing faster than ice on a hot summer's day --

then there is no reason to think that any planes were hijacked.



* OTOH, Bush stayed at a hotel in Florida the night before where his security installed
anti-missile system on the rooftop.
Guess Pentagon just didn't think of that?