Reply #69: because ...

[mrgerbik]

that you take conspiracy sites at their word when I prove quotes were chopped up like puzzle pieces by them?

Not all "conspiracy" sites chop up their quotes. Look around among the hundreds of 9/11 skeptic sites and you'll find truths, theories and conjecture, just as you would any scientific debate. I myself don't believe all the theories that are out there. Mashing all conspiracy theories together and calling it a whole is simply lazy. Most, if not all of us, just want the truth.


Why are civil engineers not smart enough or honest enough to see what laymen see?

I guess it depends on what civil engineers you talk to. Some clammed up after they clearly stated on that day or just after that the official theory was extremely improbable. I think it's alot easier to "go along" with the official reasoning - no one wants to be labeled a fringe wacko. I think peoples jobs and reputations are at stake in most cases.


The republicans want us to distrust government to help them "Drown it in a bathtub". While I don't trust them I don't think it's
all filled with corrupt people from top to bottom.

I personally don't believe it's all the Republican's work. I won't surmise as to WHO it was, but I think most politicians are in the dark on any inside work. It would be too dangerous to let everyone in on a plan of this magnitude.


You may get a % corrupt but not the number you need to pull this off?

I don't understand why you would expect that more then a small group of people would be needed to pull something like this off. Years of planning and almost anything is possible. If you can believe that a group of terrorists could pull something like this off, why not insiders?