Hi Folks,
I have been watching the debate over DNC Chair here at DU for some time. I agree with the assessment that it is the most important that Dems will make over the next two years. I also understand and respect that many here support Gov. Dean's effort. I cannot blame them, given the innovative leadership his campaign for Presidency brought to the party, and because of the efficacy of his term as head of DGA.
Some of you may have seen that I am supporting Simon Rosenberg for chair. A link to my statement can be found here:
http://www.simonforchair.com/press/press_releases/01-11-2005_Endorsements.htmlI think the statement speaks for itself. Simon is someone that I have seen put a lot of energy and thought to the long term strategy necessary to rebuild the party. Indeed, I have seen many post noting that he shares many of the same ideas of the Governor, whom I greatly respect and got to know a little after the primary.
Anyhow, I would just say two things:
1) My endorsement is not a signal from John Kerry, my stepfather, who I think has very responsibly removed himself from influencing the process.
2) I have seen many people note policy disagreements with some who are running for the Chair. The war in Iraq is a particularly pointed issue here (it is for me, too), as is a woman's right to choose. These are valid data points. Personally, I am less concerned about the DNC chair's own policy positions, and more concerned about the blocking and tackling we need to improve to win in the future.
I'd love to hear people's thoughts about point 2.
In the end, however, maybe some combination of leadership is best. In the meantime, I am very excited about the prospect of Simon's leadership.
Best to DU,
Chris