You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #32: No she doesn't because they wouldn't be impeached practically speaking simultaneously thereby allow-
[View All]
In Truth We Trust
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-12-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 32. No she doesn't because they wouldn't be impeached practically speaking simultaneously thereby allow- |
|
ing them to appoint a "gerry ford" if you will. Should bush be impeached the cheney would take the helm (not that he really isn't pulling the strings now anyway). Cheney would then pick a vp (probably hagel) and then hagel would be next in line of succesion. The same scenario would be applied certainly if Cheney were to go first.
The question is do we or do we not have a country that governs by the rule of law or not?!!!!? Where do our current candidates stand on this critical question? As said earlier upstream; silence is complicity.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread