Reply #12: Umm facts imply something is factual

[BL611]

If it was it would not be a real fact. You should be skeptical about what people present as facts, but if something can be proved to be factual, well then yes you should toss aside your deeply held convictions. Personally I think even if Saddam had chemical weapons, their were still larger strategic threats to the US (Al Que-da) and that the was most likely would not have been justified. If it was found (and again truly so and provable) that Saddam had nuclear weapons and the capacity to launch them at the US (or was close to this scenario), and that did not cause you to reevaluate your position. Then well yes that is bad.