Reply #78: LOL, still not going to examine your own hypocrisy, eh?

[MadHound]

That's OK, I understand, if I were trying to juggle those two competing notions in my brain, well my head would probably explode. Perot good, but Greens bad, yet both are thirdy party, yep, my head would explode.

So anyway, let's address your strawman diversionary arguement of GOP funding of third parties. Let's see now, who, exactly did the GOP fund? Nader, that's all. Not the Greens, nor anybody else, just Nader. When did they do this? Yeah, in '04, and only '04. And guess what, Nader brought in what, .4% of the vote. That scary, scary Nader:scared: He obviously has the most scariest superpowers of them all, able to be the Big and Mighty KINGMAKER, all with an ittty bitty vote total:crazy:

Now then, if you have any other evidence that the GOP funds any other third party or independent candidates, please give the names, dates, and a link for verification. Otherwise, your whole premise is full of it.

Now that I've addressed your strawman and made you happy, care to explain your hypocrisy in claiming how some third parties are good, while others are bad. Oh, yeah, that's right, you're trying to keep your head from exploding:eyes: