You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: I'm 100% in agreement with you on all points. I'd have NO problem with seating MI and FL if it had [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I'm 100% in agreement with you on all points. I'd have NO problem with seating MI and FL if it had
been a FAIR primary. But this is beyond ridiculous and certainly not part of any democratic process I've ever heard of. They want to seat the delegates.. fine.. let the candidates campaign and let the people vote without telling them "IT DOESNT COUNT" and with all candidates names on the freakin ballot. Also agree that who we get, in the end, is who the DLC/DNC wants. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC