You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama spent $1.3 million in Florida [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:02 AM
Original message
Obama spent $1.3 million in Florida
Advertisements [?]
Barack Obama spent a ton of cash in Florida, so could we please stop
with the myth that Obama did not try hard to win Florida's delegates?

Although the Democrats weren't able to earn delegates in Michigan or Florida, because the states scheduled early primaries without the national party's blessing, the hopefuls still spent nearly $3.4 million in those states. Hillary Clinton and Obama each spent about $130,000 in Michigan while Obama spent $1.3 million in Florida - MORE THAN ANY OTHER Democratic candidate and more than eight Republican candidates, who were eligible to win delegates from the state.
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/18/101423/027 and
http://www.capitaleye.org/inside.asp?ID=335

Hillary won in Florida, fair and square, and those delegates ought to be
seated at the Democratic national convention. Of course, the Obama supporters will continue to fantasize that Obama did not try to win Florida and claim, therefore, that the votes of the 1.7 million Floridians should not be counted. As of February 16, 2008 - 391,992 MORE Democrats, nationally, voted for Clinton than Obama.

*Count WHOSE Vote?*
by Paul Lukasiak - TaylorMarsh.com
Feb. 17, 2008

Based on exit polls, among the approximately 16.3 million people who
identified themselves as Democrats, over 678,000 more voted for Hillary
Clinton than Barack Obama. If we're going to "let the people decide" who the Democratic nominee would be, shouldn't we be basing that on the will of Democrats themselves?

The latest meme from the Barack Obama camp (and one that is being heavily
promoted by the media), is that super-delegates should comply with "the will of the people" as reflected in the popular vote count. But this was hardly even mentioned until the week after Super Tuesday, when Obama took the lead in total votes cast in the primaries.

In fact, on Super Tuesday, 295,952 more primary voters cast their ballots for Hillary Clinton than for Obama, yet somehow neither the Obama campaign, nor the media, was paying much attention to Clinton's lead in the popular vote. If we include all the states that held primaries before Super Tuesday (NH, SC, MI, FL) Clinton was UP by 468,024 votes - that was 2.51% of the total votes cast. But talking about that number was not a media priority either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC