You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: "This is not a post skewed towards either candidate." [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
67. "This is not a post skewed towards either candidate."
Um, OK.

I have actually attended a caucus, and disagree with nearly all of your points. The only valid point is the limited time . Who ever said Democracy is easy? Also, the law of averages dictates that those unable to attend would be distributed across the backers for all candidates.

And, for me, the open vote is a big plus in the Diebold era. No way to game the system.

Sorry. I would personally prefer a primary for the convenience, but the caucus system gets to the same end result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC