Reply #34: RCP links out to the various Sec of State/Election Board results.

[rinsd]

Here's their estimate explanation

*(Iowa, Nevada, Washington & Maine Have Not Released Popular Vote Totals. RealClearPolitics has estimated the popular vote totals for Senator Obama and Clinton in these four states. RCP uses the WA Caucus results from February 9 in this estimate because the Caucuses on February 9 were the “official” contest recognized by the DNC to determine delegates to the Democratic convention. The estimate from these four Caucus states where there are not official popular vote numbers increases Senator Obama’s popular vote margin by 110,224. This number would be about 50,000 less if the Washington primary results from February 19th were used instead of the Washington Caucus results.)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

She can cut it down to about 200K then make the case for inclusion of FL's pop vote total as a means for making her case to Supers

"You have no idea what the real numbers are because they vary from CNN to RCP."

I wasn't the one who made the case for millions of hidden Obama voters that did not exist. The 800K figures seems fairly close.