You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #57: ? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Ice-9 Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
57. ?
Does it strike anyone that what is really going on is that the party elders have decided they want to erase the Clinton years and the Clinton legacy.

When I hear the term "party elders," the first people I think of are Gore, Carter, and (Bill) Clinton. I wasn't aware that Gore and Carter had declared their support, but I'm pretty sure I know who Bill is supporting. (Yes, there are other elders, such as Kennedy and Daschle, who have declared their support for Obama, but it's not quite the tidal wave that you portray.)

Even if there were something to your argument about wiping away the Clinton legacy (and there may be something to that), I don't see why you lump Johnson and Carter in with him. Most people, I think, would agree that the Johnson and Carter presidencies were more progressive in outlook than the Clinton presidency. If anything, I would expect an Obama presidency to restore some of that progressivism rather than "wipe" it "away."

They have plucked Obama from relative obscurity to be the puppet. He is perfect for the role as he is always in search of mentors and he surrounds himself with older men who flatter him and are flattered in return.

Senator Obama was not plucked from relative obscurity. His national appeal was blossoming as early as 2004 when he spoke at the convention. His support has grown steadily and relentlessly since then. No one cast a spell for him. Even Senator Kennedy could not help him much in Massachusetts. His steady, persistent growth is evidence not of a "pluck[]" from "obscurity" but of his tremendous charisma, the resonance of his message, and, to a lesser extent, the craptacular campaign of his opponent.

In any case, if you want to get into demographics, I suspect you would find more older people (men and women) in Senator Clinton's corner.

They (Kerry, Kennedy, Daschle, Nunn et al.) were too cowardly to take on Bush and impeach him.

I'm not sure you want to get into a debate about which Democratic senators were too cowardly to take on Bush.

Well dressed, well spoken, well versed.

You forgot "articulate" and "clean."

http://wonkette.com/politics/joe-biden/joe-biden-discovers-clean-articulate-black-man-232908.php

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC