Reply #23: Your side of this debate is the one engaged in blatant spin

[Tom Rinaldo]

It starts with the bold repeated assertion of a lie; that it is "changing the rules" not to give the nomination to the candidate who is ahead in pledged delegates regardless of any other factor even when that candidate does not have a majority of all delegates.

Up is Down. The only change in the rules anyone is talking about is overturning the rule that states Super Delegates are free to vote their conscience. The premise of this thread starts with a lie. It is an argument IN FAVOR of changing the rules disguised as an argument AGAINST changing the rules. If you really want to have a discussion about the substance of this argument, join me at this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5439012