You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm NOT a "conspiracy theorist", but.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:15 AM
Original message
I'm NOT a "conspiracy theorist", but....
Advertisements [?]
Early this week I heard Thom Hartmann in coversation with a caller. the subject was why the press has seemingly been against Obama, and pro Clinton at this particular time. When was the turning point? they brought up the idea that in mid April Obama had made the statement that he would ask his AG to “immediately review” potential of crimes in Bush White House. I remember seeing that LARGE on the HuffPo home page. )cause I pointed it out to a co worker by saying "THAT is another reason why I'm voting for him") I haven't heard any other candidate even talk about this possibility -- and I haven't heard that discussed since. Is this whey the press is now against him?

Thom had suggested that there was something similar that Howard Dean had promised right before the "Dean Scream" became looped 24/7.

then I saw this article on HuffPo, and it feeds my conspiracy theory...ok, just kiddding with that one, but I really DO believe that the Press has WAY too much power in our elections:

"Let's start with a hypothetical situation: Suppose a small group of people controlled the press, and they wanted to ensure a Republican victory in November. A few weeks ago Obama seemed to be riding a wave of inevitability and positive perception. The Democrats seemed to have settled on a candidate, and he scored well against the Republicans because he was seen as post-racial and post-partisan. If this group were to write a memo to the media, what would it say?

Their game plan would have very specific objectives:

1. Extend the Democratic primary race as long as possible.
2. Remind the public that the seemingly "post-racial" Obama is a black man; make him seem as scary-black as possible.
3. Strengthen Hillary Clinton's image with white working-class voters by making her appear populist, folksy, and one of them. Conversely, characterize Obama as an elitist who is out of touch with "real people."
4. Break down Obama's post-partisan appeal to independents and Republicans by linking him to the divisive left/right politics of the 1960s"


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/coffeecups-and-gutterball_b_99831.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC