You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #3: I'm confused.
[View All]
amandabeech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-18-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The Huffington Post article that you link starts out as follows:
Democrats in Congress are organizing to squash a White House proposal that would require veterans to use private insurance to pay for treatment of their combat and service-related injuries.
You wrote:
The battle was about a small proposal to make insurance companies pay for non military sicknesses where the Vet had ALREADY paid insurance premiums. There were no extra co-pays and tapping "third party" insurance already EXISTS within the system. The proposal was an extension of what existed already.
Which was it? "Combat and service-related injuries" or "non-military sicknesses?"
Would you please clarify?
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread