You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: This was posted by Miss Authoritiva [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. This was posted by Miss Authoritiva
back in December. I bookmarked it and read it every now and then..


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=109&topic_id=35801

What, if anything: How to deconstruct an AP story


Incredibly, this AP story about White House Chief of Staff designate Rahm Emanuel and alleged attempts by Illinois Gov. Rod Blogojevich to “sell” Barack Obama’s vacant Senate seat took two professional reporters plus an additional contributor to produce. Let’s see what we get for all that effort.


Headline: Senate-for-Sale Case Threatens New Chief of Staff

Motivating factors for story: silence* has “prompted questions”; any “hint of scandal” damages Obama and potentially could destroy his presidency before it even begins

Unique sources: 2 tangential people and an indeterminate number of anonymous aides, sources, and supporters not authorized to speak on anyone's behalf

Main rhetorical hedges: "believed to be"; "what, if anything"

Adjectives of note: troubling, friendly

Nouns of note: ties, liability

Phrases of note: troubling liability, close ties, perception of wrongdoing

First astonishing fact: A lot of people live in Chicago and a good many of them are politically active

Second astonishing fact: “a friendly rapport” or “a friendly relationship” might not constitute “a close friendship”

Moment of inscrutability: “It was not clear whether Blagojevich inferred Emanuel's motive for advocating (Valerie) Jarrett….”

Wasted-space (we have to file something) acknowledgement: "The coming days will offer the first answers about Emanuel's recent interaction with Blagojevich and discussions about filling Obama's Senate seat."

Tidy moralistic conclusion useful even if Emanuel did nothing wrong but which damns him anyway: "We're not going to end corruption in Illinois by arrests and indictments alone," the prosecutor (US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald) said. "What's going to make the difference is when people who are approached to 'pay to play' first say no, and, second, report it."

*Prosecutor-requested silence


Well, that’s it. What, if anything, did you learn that you didn’t already know before this article was even written?

By Grace Nearing @ Scriptoids

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC