Reply #351: "we have this reversion to the idea that DU'ers are bashing Obama for the fun of it!"

[Beetwasher]

Many are. Is that surprising???

I've always stated, from the beginning I could be wrong in my assessment of the situation(s), but it's NOT as cut and dry as many of the "critics" are making it. It (The EFF suit, my OP if you bothered to read it actually addresses these cases IN GENERAL) is FAR from being the incredible outrage that some, including Turley, are making it out to be, IMO. The motion is in fact QUITE an expected development in a lawsuit of this nature.

I'm quite willing to admit I could be wrong. Are YOU willing to admit YOU could be wrong? I don't see that willingness in many of the so called "critics" in this thread that merely post contentless, derisive crap. They are CERTAIN Obama is essentially "Bought and paid for" and base it on the flimsiest of evidence after three months in office. They see merely what they WANT to see and refuse to consider anything contrary. I've read Turley, I've listened to Olberman, I respect their opinions and disagree. However, I also contend THEY COULD BE RIGHT AND I COULD BE WRONG. I also will STRONGLY defend their right to keep shouting loudly about what they think are grave injustices. More power to them, especially if they turn out to be right.

"and the oddity wasn't your "grammar" -- it was your Freudian slip --"

:rofl: Well, thank you Dr. Freud for your insight! :eyes: