You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #74: Oh, okay. Fair question. What I mean is this [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #65
74. Oh, okay. Fair question. What I mean is this
in so far as present jobs are concerned, whether they are factory jobs or white collar jobs, those particular jobs most likely cannot be saved. There are some things that can be done, of course, but you'd have to have someone else in the White House to do them right now.

You could require, for example, that any material or tools used by the United States military be manufactured--not assembled--here in the United States as a matter of National Security. We cannot rely on Japan, for example, to build fighter jets for our airforce. Pakistan cannot be relied upon to build the weapons our troops use in combat.

That is a huge number right there.

Similarly, you could require that any dataprocessing dealing with US funded mandates be done within the United States, again as a matter of National Security.

You could also require that any technology developed by any firm with financing or grants from the federal government NOT be sold to foriegn companies or nations. And when it is, the people who do so have to go to jail for a long time for treason. National Security? Yeah, again.

What this requires, of course, is a government concerned about the citizens and future of the United States. Since we've gone through decades of government run by professional politicians and have wound up in the state we are in, I'm more than happy to seek out someone who has not made politics his life to address the problems that have somehow come to pass under the control of those who did.

Jobs, health insurance, education. All of these were in trouble before Bush took office. They aren't going to magically get better by going back to the same old, same old represented by the political establishment.

I'm sorry if I haven't answered your question succinctly or clearly. It is a very big topic and a very big problem. Still, I'm convinced we'll have a better chance of dealing with our problems by moving forward with what we've learned from the failures of the past rather than sending good money after bad in a basically fruitless effort to go back to what was. Let's build something newer and better, and this time, do what we have to to keep it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC