Reply #49: But the man raped a little girl!

[CoffeeCat]

I think many people on this board are forgetting that a grown man had
sex with this sixth-grade girl.

It appears, from Hillary's defense, that the man admitted to having sex
with this six-grader.

Hillary's defense is that the girl wanted it. Hillary invoked her special
mind-reading powers--as part of her defense of this admitted pedophile rapist,
and suggested that the little girl "had fantasies about older men" and therefore
was a willing participant.

The man obviously admitted to having sex with this little girl.

You think it's ok to defend a grown man raping a sixth-grader by suggesting
that the little girl brought this on herself?

Excuse me, but an adult male having sex with an eleven-year-old girl is always
wrong and it's always a crime. For an attorney to suggest that the little girl
fantasized is heresy and conjecture--and if I had been this child's attorney, I
would have ripped Hillary Rodham Clinton a new one!

Why was her horrid conjecture even allowed to stand in that courtroom? Clinton
couldn't have possibly known for a fact that this child spent her days "fantasizing
about sex with older men".

This child grew into an adult who said that she, of course, did not fantasize about
having sex with men or with this rapist. She says she was raped. So Hillary concocted
this bullshit defense (conjecture) out of thin air.

It's revolting that this over-the-top, unprofessional defense was even allowed.