Reply #36: It depends what the definition of "is" is.

[Marie26]

Yeah, it was an excellent non-denial, very carefully phrased to give the impression that they denied the meeting, when in fact he was only disputing who he met with. But he never clarified that - no, they just published numerous "denials" claimining "inaccuracies" & left the impression that they were denying ever meeting w/Canadian officials over NAFTA, when in fact they knew the meeting had happened. They MISLEAD voters.