Reply #38: yes. about the initial report. which wasn't true.

[fishwax]

:shrug:
I don't see a denial of the meeting in there.

If the news reported that it was "Austin Goolsbee" instead of "Austan Goolsbee", or that the meeting took place at 5 pm instead of 6 pm, that gives Obama license to deny the entire story.
:rofl: Yeah, that's really akin to what happened here. Talk about doublespeak. The initial story was false. Obama denied it. How dare he deny a false report!

But there's still no evidence to support the claim that he lied about the meeting.