You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: Possible, yes; probable, no [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Possible, yes; probable, no
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 11:29 PM by Spider Jerusalem
Probability is a decisive factor; Clinton needs, at present, 62% of the remaining 611 (not 691; check your facts). The electoral math is not in her favour; and, per the delegate count here, with the recently added California delegates , the delegate count stands at 1370 to 1218 (with the projected totals from Texas, with the caucus giving Obama four more delegates, those numbers shift to 1378-1222).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC