You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: Boxer was stronger in California than HRC has been in New York [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Boxer was stronger in California than HRC has been in New York
And New York is more liberal than our state.

ergo, Boxer would have been the stronger candidate and I would've been happy to vote for her in the primary.

and despite being an actual liberal, unlike HRC, making tough votes in a state that is not easy for her, she speaks her mind --and the voters have backed her since 1992.

Barbara speaks for me :applause: (although not on her primary choice):dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC