Reply #76: You need to try to be honest when you insist on discussing issues.

[merh]

The "not trustyworthy or honest" was Obama's folks to some super delegates, not at all unlike Hillary's or her camp's discussions with superdelegates, to include but not be limited to, Richardson. You know, that bit about how he can't be elected, yadayadayada.

That "attack" as you view it has nothing on the attacks of Hillary, her efforts to mock the hope and the spirit of the Obama campaign. It is also interesting to note that as she was dogging the campaign, she was trying to capture that same spirit by stealing the campaign slogans. Seems slimey and yes, untrustworthy. That double speak that Edwards called her on.

She isn't trustworthy - that goes back to the issue you continue to dodge.

How can it be considered trustworthy to propose a mandatory health care plan that will contain regulations which will garnish the wages of the workers who cannot afford health care, YET you don't pay the health care insurance premiums for your workers?

How is that trustworthy?

How is it trustworthy to not pay the invoices for those small businesses and communities and organizations that helped you organize your gatherings?

How is it trustworthy to call Obama on what he hasn't done in the senate when, as a chair of a subcommittee tasked with overseeing the environment and toxic substances, you have failed to hold any such hearings and/or propose anything until it was publicly convenient?

I could go on and on - yes, saying she isn't trustworthy is legitimate - dashing the hopes of others, the spirit of those who dare to want change and mocking them as sheep and belittling them without knowing what they know of the issues is more than just "untrustworthy" - it is disgusting.

.