40. You also said "Quid pro quo. Tit for tat." which indicates that you don't
think Edwards deserves the spot based only upon his abilities. There is no "Quid pro quo. Tit for tat." if Edwards is simply the best man for the job. It's also worth noting that Edwards hasn't been named AG, people here are simply excited about the possibility that he would accept it.
You have jumped to a conclusion that demeans John Edwards based upon an absolute lack of facts. Why do that? All I can think of is "sour grapes".
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(834 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
