Reply #10: Evidence? someone pls post the part of the suit that gives the key evidenc

[oscar111]

namely , for the 130,OOO vote switch.

"believed" is the word i see here. "believed, that thru error, fraud, or mistake"

OK, he believes. Judge will demand evidence. I am on Arnebeck's side, and not slamming him... perhaps evidence is in the part not in the brief summary posted here.

Would someone pls post that evidence from the papers of the suit? It is the biggest key part in this whole thing.

on edit, i see that the huge 130K switch of votes is alleged "on information" and was done by traditional ballot addition and deletion. Hmmmmmmm
So the evidence must be a person or persons who saw/knows of ballots being added and subtracted. Great! The public will understand that better than hacking or statistical reasoning.

KERRY WON, GET OVER IT.

NEW ELECTIONS NOW,
oscar