|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
GuvWurld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 02:22 PM Original message |
Vets For Peace Ch. 56 Circulates Open Letter on Election Conditions |
Advertisements [?]
http://guvwurld.blogspot.com/2006/02/press-release-vets-for-peace-ch-56.html
Press Release: Vets For Peace Ch. 56 Circulates Open Letter on Election Conditions ---------------------------------------------------- PRESS RELEASE: FOR RELEASE TUESDAY FEBRUARY 28, 2006 HUMBOLDT BAY VETERANS FOR PEACE ENDORSES VOTER CONFIDENCE COMMITTEE'S CALL FOR ANSWERS FROM COUNTY AND CITY LEADERS - VFP concerned over questionable voting machine software, departmental accountability, lack of voter confidence -------------------------------------------------- Tuesday, February 28, 2006, Eureka, CA - Humboldt Bay Veterans for Peace (VFP56) is officially endorsing the Voter Confidence Committee's appeal to the Humboldt County elections department to take responsibility for ensuring transparent and verifiably accurate election conditions. Among the recommendations noted, VFP urges local city councils and the County Board of Supervisors to adopt the VCC's Voter Confidence Resolution, which outlines conditions likely to ensure conclusive election outcomes and create a basis for confidence in the results reported. In this recently released letter to county government leaders, VFP declared that "current election conditions guarantee inconclusive outcomes. The Humboldt elections department needs to be responsible and proactive in creating transparent and verifiably accurate election conditions." Regarding the call to action, VFP Secretary Jim Sorter stated; "We need to have the illegal Diebold machines seen for what they are. We need paper ballots to have an election or else it is just a selection and our voices aren't heard." VFP RECOMMENDATIONS ------------------- According to the letter, VFP56 is recommending the following: 1. Investigation of Diebold uncertified software installation in voting machines. 2. Election department officials acknowledge and affirm their understanding of the GAO's findings, and to act in accordance with those findings. 3. Diebold be declared an unfit business partner, ruling out any further use of Diebold voting equipment and any future contracts with Diebold. 4. Conduct town hall forums to involve the public in discussing preferred election conditions, and to educate about current conditions. 5. Require the county's new election advisory board to detail steps and costs for establishing voting processes owned and operated entirely in the public domain. 6. City Councils and County Board of Supervisors adopt the Voter Confidence Resolution outlining conditions likely to ensure conclusive election outcomes and create a basis for confidence in the results reported. VCC EXPECTS MORE CITIZENS DEMANDING ANSWERS ------------------------------------------- Dave Berman, author of the Voter Confidence Resolution, the GuvWurld blog and co-founder of the Voter Confidence Committee of Humboldt County, says "I'm glad to have the support of VFP on this matter and expect to see more citizens and community groups demanding answers and consequences." Berman added that local media and law enforcement have an obligation to determine what government official(s) allowed Diebold to install uncertified software in Humboldt's voting machines. According to Berman, the Board of Supervisors is long overdue to take responsibility for replacing the County's illegal Diebold voting machines with a transparent, secure and verifiably accurate voting system: hand-counted paper ballots. "Public office holders in Humboldt County should know that personal accountability comes with the job," he said. Gordon Anderson, a member of VFP, added; "Vets For Peace is very concerned about the election process. We want it to be a truly documentable and accurate representation of citizens' vote choices. Hopefully the election advisory board and the elections department can find a way to resolve the discrepancies that still exist with using illegal and questionable equipment." The full text of the open letter follows this release. CONTACT: ------- Dave Berman, Phone: (707) 845-3749 for an immediate live interview Email: blog@guvwurld.org ------- An open letter from Veterans For Peace Chapter 56 February 2, 2006 To the Humboldt County Elections Department, Board of Supervisors, and all employees of our local government. As Veterans For Peace, our commitment to peace is equal to our devotion to justice. Over the last five years, both peace and justice have eroded. It is not just illegal and immoral wars; our most precious rights have been sacrificed to “free speech zones,” the suspension of posse comitatus and habeas corpus, and disenfranchisement that has become universal and guaranteed. The Supreme Court decided the 2000 presidential election; the voting public did not. When paperless electronic voting was introduced, votes could not be recounted. Unverifiable votes ensure inconclusive outcomes that will never receive unanimous acceptance from the public. Arcata took notice of this and adopted the Voter Confidence Resolution(1) stating: “When elections are conducted under conditions that prevent conclusive outcomes, the Consent of the Governed is not sought. Absent this self-evident source of legitimacy, such Consent is not to be assumed or taken for granted.”VFP56 has twice endorsed this resolution. We seek not to accept election conditions that will continue to guarantee inconclusive outcomes. Vital to this effort is increased awareness of the report(2) released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in October 2005. More than 100 pages meticulously document insecure and unreliable conditions of U.S. elections. Perhaps the most revealing comment occurs on page 38: “Nevertheless, there is evidence that some of these concerns – including weak controls and inadequate testing – have caused problems with recent elections, resulting in the loss and miscount of votes.”The official non-partisan watchdog arm of Congress has determined that votes were lost and miscounted in recent elections. This necessarily means that the true outcome cannot be known from those “elections.” The GAO report also cites an April 2004 CA Secretary of State (SoS) Staff Report(3). On page 3, the SoS report confirms that in 2003, Diebold installed uncertified software in voting machines in 17 California counties, including Humboldt. The report indicates this violates state law, and that Diebold confesses to this crime. VFP56 is calling upon the Humboldt County District Attorney and Grand Jury, as well as all local government and media to investigate who is accountable for Humboldt’s voting machines having uncertified software installed, and whether those responsible were complicit in this action or simply negligent? One other essential reference from the GAO describes problems inherent with using modems for data transfer (vote tallies, from precincts to a “central tabulator”). Page 25 of the GAO report points to a Trusted Agent Report(4) prepared for the Maryland General Assembly. This Maryland report describes (p.20) successful efforts to alter election results by exploiting vulnerabilities in Diebold’s GEMS central tabulator, the same software used for counting votes in Humboldt County. A successful “hack” of GEMS has also been conducted under the supervision of Leon County, FL elections officials, resulting in two Florida counties terminating their relationship with Diebold. The GEMS hack was also demonstrated on national television (CNBC) with the footage immortalized in Votergate the Movie, available for free download on the Internet(5). Current election conditions guarantee inconclusive outcomes. The Humboldt elections department needs to be responsible and proactive in creating transparent and verifiably accurate election conditions. We know that it is a difficult time. To exhibit our understanding, here is one last citation from page four of the SoS report: Diebold’s conduct has created an untenable situation for both county and state elections officials. Some county officials have felt compelled to defend untested, unqualified and uncertified Diebold voting systems, having authorized large capital outlays only to find out on the eve of or during an election that the systems do not function as promised. Before the March (2004) Primary, county officials repeatedly warned that, without certification of particular voting system components, the election could not be conducted because it was too late to devise and implement back-up plans.Perhaps this “untenable situation” remains. Before it is too late we are depending upon you as county officials to solve this illegal and immoral dilemma. There are options available. A legitimate system must be in place that creates conclusive and verifiably accurate results. Priorities must be accuracy and transparency rather than expediency. Hand counted paper ballots may be a real option for now. VFP56 recommends the following:
In Respect and Peace, Veterans For Peace Humboldt Bay Chapter 56 ----------------------------------------------------- (1) http://guvwurld.blogspot.com/2005/04/voter-confidence-resolution.html (2) http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05956.pdf (3) http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/ks_dre_papers/diebold_report_april20_final.pdf (4) http://www.raba.com/press/TA_Report_AccuVote.pdf (5) http://www.votergate.tv NOTE: This letter is archived here: http://tinyurl.com/rvks6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC