You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #179: Well, you expect those of us who believe that the 2004 election was a "steal" to explain [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #174
179. Well, you expect those of us who believe that the 2004 election was a "steal" to explain
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 01:29 PM by truedelphi
Ourselves from scratch every time the subject is brought up.

And in reading your remarks in your earlier posts on this topic, you are suggesting that to "prove" one way or the other, we need to examine every precenct and every County in the state of Ohio.

Of course there was more than Ohio involved, so actually according to your logic, we would have to examine every precinct and every County in the USA.

Now the problem is (And I have made the SAME remarks to my friend Autorank) IF THE ELECTION WAS INDEED STOLEN, no examination of anything will prove that it was stolen! At least not by examining numbers at the individual County level, and since the thieves were in charge and had the capability of switching the votes electronically.

There is simply NO WAY at all to take the electronic summaries of the vote tallies in every County in the USA and be able to decide anything.
At one time I had thought that finding the overall vote tallies on the national level might be a good way to start. I soon gave up because, again, if there was a theft, with the thieves in charge, if that is among my hypotheses, then my conclusion has to be that I cannot come up with an overall national total.

If your house is ransacked, and the thieves not only swipe your valuables, but replace your video of what you owned with a video that they created showing you owned far less, what can you prove?

One place I can point to to use as my defense of this syllogism is the state of New Mexico. When you have little tiny precincts where there should have been 67 votes for President and there ended up only being 8 or so, it indicates that the Powers that Be managed to put in place of the voters' choice 61 blanks. (I am using these figures off the top of my head, but they are similiar to the figures quoted in "Stealing America" the coumentary by DForothy Faddiman.) Because of the mismanagement of the vote theft in New Mexico, and the tireless work of the activists, New Mexico now has PAPER BALLOTS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC