Reply #30: Your link is to an interview, not to source code

[patriothackd]

A plagiarized interview at that. Do you have permission to reprint Harris's work?

It does not discuss the delivery mechanisms built into the motherboard nor the other items I mentioned above. Is your purpose simply to write simple-minded sound bytes hoping readers will develop doubt?

One really must ask what your intent is. Are you pleased that the U.S. scientific community, the New York Times, the mainstream media, congressional investigators and state voting system authorities are finally taking this seriously and taking action (albeit inadequate actions which still need to be proven)?

It would seem that each step forward would be welcomed by those interested in election reform. Your belittling of these findings demeans the public education being delivered through mainstream media coverage. I've just been told you are from Georgia, a state blanketed with these machines.

Your belittling of the findings and the new momentum to make changes is mystifying. It reveals a lot about your intent.