You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: Important #2 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
BernieBear Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. Important #2
You just went to where he wanted to go and he knows you can't win that argument

The point was the data sets differed a statistically significant amount. How and why weren't your objective. Your objective was for him to agree the two data sets were statistically significantly "odd".

Now he's got you arguing what he wanted you to argue, which he knows makes you look like a :tinfoilhat:

It's like the prosecuter that tells the jury the defendant is obviously guilty because the defense doesn't show who did "do it".

It's like - what's that got to do with the original question.

Good Luck, BernieBear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC