Reply #43: Zero substantiation of your allegations

[ironbark]

and now you close off with a vague reference to ‘The term’ (The one whos name we must not speak Harry?)

“ an insult and it is clearly intended as one”.

You are invited (nay challenged) to link to the post that contained such “insult” directed at you or at any individual.
You are also invited (nay challenged) to reveal the post/s of mine from which you ascertain “intent” that runs counter to my clearly stated pov.

Until then, yet again. I shall place the evidence you provide of my “clearly intended insult” with that for “bashing and insulting others” along with the evidence you previously provided for- “Or will you continue on the mean & dirty path with personal slurs..” .
Should your substantiation rise above zero….I’ll get back to you on it.

Here’s a plan Trotsky…why don’t you keep on repeating “intended insult” and “bashing and insulting others” and “nasty attitude” and “continued antagonism” over and over again without substantiation until folk believe- “Well…it has been alleged so often it must be true”………..hmmmmm?

Perhaps people will take it on faith...blind faith.

“already apologized for the grave sin of mistaking you for a believer”

Nice spin but wrong sin. (Sin. Said to be an Aramaic archery term for ‘missing the mark/target)
Your ‘evil’ (point at which the arrow landed having missed the mark) is not that you mistook me for a ‘Bible banger believer’ but that (then and now) you continue to fling allegations and refuse to pause to explain, justify or substantiate.

Apologising for one as you hasten to deliver a host more is the ‘sin’

“tells me all I need to know about your character”.

And therein resides the primary distinction between us Trotsky….you are prepared (in a single post) to claim insight into both my “intent” and my “character”….while providing ZERO ZIP ZILCH evidence to support your psychic assertions.

I on the other hand have, and will continue to, deal only with your explicit ‘behaviour’ie >what you actually say<
I have not and will not speculate about your character and intent…because I do not assume such godlike powers (nor expect of others belief in things unseen)

I have never asked or expected “apology”….I ask and expect the foundation of peace-
reason and fairness….substantiate or retract