Reply #11: silliness

[cosmik debris]

Your first statement is unprovable.

Then you have a conditional statement where you don't prove that the condition exists or that the result is necessary.

Then you create a subjective definition of good and evil and try to spin them into your other speculations.

Then you pretend that you have laid the foundation for a profound conclusion.

Let me help you out a little.

God is what you believe he is. The attributes of god are whatever you want them to be. Any paradox that arises is due to YOUR accident of giving god the wrong attributes. That is a result of trying to define fictional characters.

If you are not happy with the paradoxical god, make up one that suits your needs a little better.