No sense in denying it. But considering I had no "argument" that you think you refuted, I'm really not sure what direction you're trying to take this in now. I said that Paul claimed he met Jesus. I asked you for proof to the contrary - but you have none, instead pulling out a red herring over the definition of the word "met."
The #1 definition of "meet" at
dictionary.com is
to come upon; come into the presence of; encounter.
Tell me why the biblical account of Paul meeting Jesus doesn't come under that definition. Go ahead, I'm waiting.