Reply #68: Oh, I took your word for it at first.

[beam me up scottie]

Until I read your last post.

ozone man tried many times to explain his point of view and finally resorted to bringing up the hypocrisy of condemning Harris while supporting Clark:

When you talk about the ethics of torture and cast a stone at Sam Harris, then you should be willing to receive a stone thrown at the guy in your avatar (Wes Clark), if that's a contradiction to your argument. This is after all an R&T forum within a larger Democratic discussion forum. I think R&T includes ethics and morality. I think it was fair game.

Just thought I'd point out the hypocrisy of calling the comparison of Harris to Clark "inappropriate" and "an attempt at making a low blow" by someone whose thread was based on a straw man and intended to insult atheists.

:hi: