You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: From recent press conference [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. From recent press conference
From the press conference invitation:

LeMoine has for some time been trying to get a discharge from the U.S. Army, but he has so far been unsuccessful. He has applied for “Conscientious Objector” status, because the U.S. military invasion and occupation of Iraq are against his religious beliefs; this application is still pending. Rather than release LeMoine, on March 4, 2005, the U.S. Army charged him with refusal to obey orders.

Statment of U.S. Army Specialist Blake Lemoine:

I have been hearing far too much about the American All Volunteer Army lately. It is true that the draft is not in effect. No one is forced to join the American Military, but it is very much like a roach motel. People check in but they can't check out. The enlistment contract is a slave contract and unfortunately I found this out far too late. The Thirteenth Amendment guarantees that no citizen of the United States will have to endure slavery or enforced servitude. I was speaking to a congressman's aide about this and was directly told that the UCMJ* (Uniform Code of Military Justice) overrides that amendment. It does not apply to soldiers. There are many men and women who would tender their two-weeks notice if they could. The consequence for quitting is several years in jail. The military claims that this is just them holding you to your contract. I can understand that the US military's contract must be different than civilian contracts. The difference is the fact that if one party wishes to terminate their contract the other party will use guns (i.e. the military police) to ensure otherwise. If someone can answer a question for me I will be greatly appreciative. If I am a volunteer, why do they need to hold a gun in my face to make me work?
More ...
http://www.notinourname.net/troops/lemoine-28mar05.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC