You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Taylor Makes It Clear: Bush Is a Criminal [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 09:18 AM
Original message
Judge Taylor Makes It Clear: Bush Is a Criminal
Advertisements [?]
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0822-25.htm

Judge Taylor Makes It Clear: Bush Is a Criminal
by Matthew Rothschild

They’re the only ones standing in the way of Bush’s lawlessness.

Thursday’s decision by Judge Anna Diggs Taylor represents a huge and welcome slapdown to Bush. And no amount of slamming the judge by the pundits on the right over the weekend can detract from its power. Ruling the NSA spying to be illegal and unconstitutional, Judge Taylor said Bush was acting like a king.

The Administration, the judge ruled, “undisputedly” violates the Fourth Amendment, “undisputedly” violates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, violates the First Amendment, and violates the separation of powers. (You can find her ruling at aclu.org or by clicking here.)

Not mincing any words, she added: “The Constitution itself has been violated.”

She shredded the Administration’s two main arguments: that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Al Qaeda justifies Bush’s spying, and that his commander in chief powers justify that spying.

As far as the first claim, she noted, “The AUMF says nothing whatsoever of intelligence or surveillance.” She also pointed out that FISA says “the exclusive means” by which electronic surveillance can occur is with a warrant. The Bush Administration’s contention that the AUMF implies general powers, including warrantless surveillance, to the President collides with the specific prohibition against such spying, she ruled. And she cited Supreme Court precedent that “the specific governs the general.”

As to the Administration’s second argument, on the President’s commander in chief powers, Judge Taylor properly noted that the logic of this claim is that the President has “the inherent power to violate not only the laws of Congress but the First and Fourth Amendments of the Constitution.”

She cited the precedent in Ex Parte Milligan that says, “The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace.”

Judge Taylor’s decision not only puts the Administration on notice. It puts Congress and all of us as citizens on notice: Bush is a law-breaker of the highest order.


However, this is not the first time it has been pointed out that the current fascist regeim in control of our country beleives that they are the law. In the opnion of the 11th district court of appeals on the final Terri Schiavo case, the ruling states:

"A popular epithet directed by some members of society, including some members of Congress, toward the judiciary involves the denunciation of “activist judges.” Generally, the definition of an “activist judge” is one who decides the outcome of a controversy before him according to personal conviction, even one sincerely held, as opposed to the dictates of the law as constrained by legal
precedent and, ultimately, our Constitution.

In resolving the Schiavo controversy it is my judgment that, despite sincere and altruistic motivation, the legislative and executive branches of our government have acted in a manner demonstrably at
odds with our Founding Fathers’ blueprint for the governance of a free people — our Constitution. Since I have sworn, as have they, to uphold and defend that Covenant, I must respectfully concur in the denial of the request for rehearing en banc. I conclude that Pub. L.109-3 (“the Act”) is unconstitutional and, therefore, this court and the district court are without jurisdiction in this case1 under thatspecial Act and should refuse to exercise any jurisdiction that we may otherwisehave in this case."

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0511628p.pdf

Unfortunatly, most Americans aren't paying attention and this is why we are losing our country.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC