Reply #12: don't patronize me

[iverglas]

Your failure to understand / acknowledge the nature of equality rights in the 21st century, in the big wide world and even in the USofA, just makes your attempt look less than clever.

My point had nothing to do with your "establishment clause". If you cared to address my point, other than by expressing your baseless personal opinion that to simply expose children to some religious-based songs and themes at a cultural event celebrating a national holiday does not infringe on their religious liberty ... well, I guess you would have done so.


Is that really on par with being assaulted, as you stated in your post? I think that's an exaggeration.

Actually, I think that's a blatantly false statement, and I have no idea why you have made it, since I in fact stated no such thing. Perhaps you're needing a new prescription; you seem to be seeing things that are not there. And not seeing what is quite clearly there.