You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: I think that's right. Without looking at both populations it's hard to determine addiction source. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I think that's right. Without looking at both populations it's hard to determine addiction source.
I am intrigued by the notion of studying the "ho-hum" subset because you are at the opposite extreme from the easily addicted. I'd bet the addiction is mostly brain chemistry and has very little to do with social or economic issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC