You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: I think reply #3 states it about as well as I could [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I think reply #3 states it about as well as I could
Repeatable experiments, design of the experiments to utilize control cases, interpreting the results of an experiment in the context it was designed in, ie., what is called the 'scientific method'.

It shouldn't have anything to do with WHAT is studied -- but rather HOW it is studied. You can (and some do) attempt to study parapsychology or bigfoot and UFO sightings with science, and still do good science. You probably won't find many thrilling answers that way, but they will probably be more correct answers, assuming you did good science.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC