Reply #9: It is not a negative, but blm somehow was implying that JK and his people

[Mass]

were involved, and this is what created the negative reaction in the thread I read.

There may be plenty of valid reasons for Kerry not to be involved directly, but in this case, it is difficult to claim that he is.

On edit: TayTay gave us a very valid reason for Kerry not to be involved that I had forgotten.