|
I've know some CEO's in my time. I honestly can't imagine that any CEO would not be PROUD of being someone who was asked to give advice to the President or VP of the United States. So, why would they need anonymity? It would seem it would be good for business to be seen as that important.
That excuse never washed with me, and i've never heard any commentator bring that up. The Bush Mob keeps talking about the need to get unvarnished advice. Who would give them anything but, especially if they were going to get credit and notoriety from it?
It's a stupid excuse and nobody has challenged them on it. The press could have asked that question without sounding partisan. It's simply a logical question, with no political leanings intrinsic. Isn't it? The Professor
|