You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #49: Yes, the COURT says, not the PRESIDENT! And that's how they broke [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)

Catrina

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Feb-07-06 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #19

49. Yes, the COURT says, not the PRESIDENT! And that's how they broke

the law. They by-passed the court.

I don't know if I'm remembering this, but didn't they intend to hold Hamdi indefinitely, without trial or charges (he is a US citizen) and didn't it go to the SC who ruled they could not? I'm not sure, but if that's the case, he's lost his whole argument, even if he had one to begin with.

I'm sick of these crooks twisting the law to the point that we may as well not have any laws anymore. I hope they nail this little torture creep tomorrow. The Consitution is under attack by these people and someone needs to stand up for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.