You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: Minneapolis winters ain't what they used to be [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
70. Minneapolis winters ain't what they used to be
When I lived here in the 1950s and 1960s and again in the early 1980s, snow usually arrived in mid-November at the latest and stayed till mid-April. I wore snowboots for Easter as often as not. We often had weeks of subzero temperatures on end--I remember going to seventh grade on a day when the high was 36 below. During my senior year in college, I remember a day when the high was 27 below. One winter in the 1980s, we had two 18" snowfalls on consecutive days.

After 19 years in Oregon, I moved back here in 2003, and so far, I have not experienced a real old-fashioned Minneapolis winter. There has been little snow, and no snowfalls over six inches. Nothing that even remotely resembles a blizzard like the one in 1965, when my school was closed for three days. (My youngest nephew, age 10, has never experienced a "snow day" off from school.) The lowest air temperature has been about 20 below at night, but we have had no double-digit-below daily highs (not that I miss those).

We have to start getting rid of the elephant in the living room: cars. Yet the world is going in the wrong direction, with more cars and more housing being built in places that are accessible only by car.

Sorry folks, we're going to have to stop that. I don't care how much you "love" your car. Your car and mine are killing this planet, and your emotional attachment to a piece of machinery doesn't mean squat in the larger scheme of things.

We need the political courage to slash the Pentagon budget and REALLY defend ourselves by building the infrastructure for non-automotive transportation (trains, bicycles, streetcars, feet, electric buses, even low-fuel scooters) and retrofitting towns, cities, and suburbs for non-automotive mobility (for example, by building paths from housing areas to stores, schools, and services). With the proper infrastructure, a non-driver has as much "freedom" as a driver, perhaps more, because of not needing to worry about parking, fuel, insurance, or other expenses.

I drive as little as possible, and I do so only because the public transit in the Twin Cities is pathetic and doesn't go some of the places I need to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC