You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #49: The teacher's unions? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. The teacher's unions?
You mean, those folks who actually KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT TEACHING? Christ, why would we listen to THEM? I mean sure, we go to doctors when we have a medical question, and lawyers when we have a legal question, and we go to plumbers when we have a leak, and astronomers when we have a question about the sun, but going to teachers when we have a question about teaching? Ridiculous!

Do you want to know the REAL reason that shitty teachers aren't fired from most districts? It's because there's no one else to replace them, and most districts figure that a bad teacher is better than no teacher at all. Mostly the unions are just involved in making sure that management adheres to the contract. After all, unions are made up of teachers, hard-working professionals who are as ashamed of the bad teachers and the worse working conditions as anyone else would be.

Why is there no one else to replace them? Because of people like you, who claim that the failure with our educational system is "educators fail to educate." A convenient scapegoat, and one that has been going on for a hundred years or more. There's no respect.

But it's not entirely your fault, or even mostly your fault. The districts can't replace them, because they don't pay enough. They don't have the cash to woo someone from the private sector in to teach math or science. It's entering a life of service: they'll never be respected, always get paid less, and always have to work more than someone else with the same degree and abilities in a similar field.

And they'll do it in substandard conditions. Rats. Power shortages. Random violence. Gang-and-drug related violence. Parents who can't read, and are actually proud of that fact. Money doesn't make a difference? Then why is it that "Low-income black students" are the big losers? Could it be that they don't have enough copies of Macbeth or To Kill a Mockingbird lying around? That those schools don't have the best teachers because the best teachers have already moved on to better-paying districts or easier schools? And what about the condition of our society itself? All someone has to do to see the anti-intellectual, superficial, valueless society we have created is to turn on the cable television for a few minutes.

The only thing I agree with you on is the lack of discipline in schools -- but you've still got it wrong. It's not judicial fiats that have caused this mess, it's the well-intentioned legislatures of all fifty states and the federal congress. Everytime they pass a law about education, I fond myself saying, "Forgive them, Lord, for they know not what they do."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC