You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Technically, isn't it a Sectarian rather than a Civil War? (Sunni vs. Shia [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Technically, isn't it a Sectarian rather than a Civil War? (Sunni vs. Shia
For the life of me I can't figure out how it can be stopped without either a) a brutal dictatorship , b) partition or c) genocide of one sect (excluding the possibility of both sects becoming secular). It seems to me that calling it a Civil War implies that after hostilites are over there can be peace based on a simple switch of civic allegiance by the defeated parties, but in the case of a Sectarian War it would require far more to insure peace.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC