Reply #76: I read the Conyers report

[Cocoa]

I thought the exit poll section was relatively unconvincing, compared to the actual empirical evidence of irregularities. I imagine the book would be the same. I find that whole line of argument to be of little value, relatively speaking.

That's my opinion. What's fact is that regardless of what I think of the exit poll arguments, John Conyers does not say that they prove the election was stolen. That fact is in no way related to my opinion of the argument or to yours.