You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Administration must have some really good dirt on a certain lawyer [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 06:45 AM
Original message
Bush Administration must have some really good dirt on a certain lawyer
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 06:45 AM by ck4829
This lawyer could be defending a guy linked to the CIA torture flights scandal, and the thing is, the guy being defended may not even exist.

"Portland attorney Scott Caplan says "client confidences" prevent him from identifying Leonard Thomas Bayard, a mysterious businessman whose company is linked by human rights activists to allegations of CIA-sponsored torture. In a letter to the Oregon State Bar last week, Caplan denied any wrongdoing and asked a professional complaint against him be dismissed.

The bar is investigating an allegation that Caplan represented the company, Bayard Foreign Marketing, under false pretenses. Bayard once owned a Gulfstream jet that human rights groups say has been used by the CIA to ferry terrorism suspects to countries that allegedly practice torture.

As Bayard's attorney, Caplan registered the company with the state in 2003. The company's registration identifies its owner as Leonard Bayard, but public records searches by newspapers and human rights organizations have been unable to locate him. Activists charge that Bayard and his company were made up by the CIA.

Bar disciplinary counsel Mary Cooper wrote to Caplan last month and asked that he identify Bayard, warning of potential disciplinary action if he does not. In his letter, dated Jan. 31, Caplan replied that he cannot comply with her request."

http://www.oregonlive.com/business/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/business/1170818763231640.xml&coll=7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC