You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: It's not profitable [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. It's not profitable
but only because there is so much added in parts/service. The only reason the EV1 was developed at all was in response to CA's zero emission mandate, which was repealed under extremely heavy lobbying by the auto industry (btw, power companies have always been big proponents of EVs).

The auto industry never wanted to have anything to do with seat belts or airbags either, but they had to be squeezed. Environmental responsibility is a bitch, and they need to be squeezed again (if you haven't seen the movie, see it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC